Compare best selling home use wet and dry cleaning machine vacuum cleaner korea Zhejiang Zhenan Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. US $20-25 100 Pieces Transaction Level As insulting as it may be for robots, we’ve always wanted a robot that does the cleaning for us. How can we not? After all, cleaning takes us away from playing with our kids, hanging out with friends, and relaxing as a family. However, even though it has been more than a decade since robotic vacuum cleaners were introduced, cleaning still remains a chore that we wish we could avoid. At IFA 2014, Samsung’s latest robot vacuum machine, VR9000, was introduced. And with the hope of eliminating the negative connotation of cleaning, we would like to tell you why this is something you want to take a look at. Robot Vacuum Cleaners are weak. Compared to conventional vacuum cleaners, robotic vacuums are smaller, so it is understandable for people to think that Robotic vacuums have less suction power. But looks can be deceiving.

Powerbot VR9000 sucks away that entire stereotype. Its suction power is enhanced up to 60 times more than the conventional robot cleaners! So from dog hair to dust balls, expect your floor to be swept clean. Robot Vacuum Cleaners are slow. Because of their relatively small size, it takes more time for them to clean. However, the VR9000 features an enlarged 300mm-wide brush, so it covers more area in one sweep, reducing the overall time of its operation.Robot Vacuum Cleaners are dumb. For something that is called ‘robot’, people tend to think less of the technological advancement of the robot vacuums. If you think that way, it is cool; you are entitled to your opinion. But let the Powerbot VR9000 tell you about some of its technology. First of all, it utilizes this tech called FullView Sensor, which allows the VR9000 to recognize and comprehend the surroundings more quickly with the onboard camera and CPU chips. Therefore, it doesn’t get stuck in the corner. Actually, it also utilizes various sensors to locate even very narrow or small obstacles, so it cleans the area more efficiently.

Robot Vacuum Cleaners can’t move. It has been said that robot vacuum cleaners are not effective because they get stuck everywhere.  However, “Easy Pass” wheels were added to the wings of the Powerbot VR9000.  These allow for more  leverage to maneuver over obstacles on the floor, and the Powerbot VR9000 is able to overcome hurdles. This means it can operate on more than just 2 dimensional surfaces; like the lip of the door or over wires. Obviously, VR9000 cannot complete all the chores you need to do around your house. However, it sure can reduce the amount of time and effort you spend on them, and allow you to enjoy some much-deserved “me time”. The exhibition visitors at IFA 2014 have seen what the VR9000 can do and have been impressed. The Powerbot VR9000 has literally been cleaning the floor, quietly and effectively. *All functionality features, specifications, and other product information provided in this document including, but not limited to, the benefits, design, pricing, components, performance, availability, and capabilities of the product are subject to change without notice or obligation.

Samsung Electronics has filed a lawsuit demanding 10bn Korean won (£5.6m) in compensation from the British appliance maker Dyson because it claims it was depicted as a copycat.aquarium power vacuum cleaner The lawsuit, filed last week in the Seoul district court in Korea, were filed against Dyson because its “previous litigation has hurt Samsung’s corporate image”, the company told the Korea Times.vacuum cleaner sharp wet dry The move follows the decision by Dyson in October 2013 to drop a patent infringement case that it brought against Samsung in August, in which it claimed that the Korean giant had copied the steering system used in its Motion Sync cleaner from the Dyson DC37 and DC39 cleaners, which had then been on sale for two years.new bosch cylinder vacuum cleaner

Samsung was able to defend itself against Dyson’s case by presenting “prior art” - an example of the idea being used before Dyson had patented it. Samsung said when the lawsuit was withdrawn that it would establish the damage to its brand image and whether to act. “We are initially seeking 10bn won from the UK-based manufacturer. However, the amount will increase depending on how the court proceedings go,” Samsung’s spokesperson told the Korea Times. “Samsung’s marketing activities were negatively affected by Dyson’s groundless litigation, which is intolerable.” A Dyson spokesperson said that it had not received a copy of the formal complaint. “We’re not apologising,” he added. It is not the first time that Samsung Electronics has been accused of copying a rival. A high-profile case against Apple began in 2011 with an accusation by the iPhone maker that some Samsung phone and tablet designs “slavishly copies” that of early models of the iPhone smartphone and iPad tablet.

Apple won the case relating to copying of the appearance of the iPhone 3GS, though not its iPad. When Dyson filed its suit in August, its chief executive James Dyson said: “Although they are copying Dyson’s patented technology, their machine is not the same. Samsung has many patent lawyers so I find it hard not to believe that this is a deliberate or utterly reckless infringement of our patent.” Following the latest salvo from Samsung, Dyson said in a statement: “Dyson pioneered cyclonic vacuum cleaners and digital motors – and has been developing them ever since. We patent our technology, and naturally defend it. It is surprising that a company over 100 times bigger than Dyson is so worried. The patent system offers us some protection but not enough: with an army of lawyers, hidden prior art is occasionally found and ways to design around existing patents identified.” James Dyson has been a fierce defender of patents and intellectual property, fighting and winning a number of high-profile court cases to defend innovations in the company’s products.